in my present dafft. So ur have left it unnoticed in writing to hire ). B.
Out for my own fast. I patty
fear that it is illegal.
The that I Vist. C. 22. reciting
Act
Kat darth Las pressiles, whether
Caur periding for the adreissibility of
Evidence of purous belonging to "bartowns
X
uncivilized peoples, delibush
7
the
knowhare of for 2 of any religioses belief."
would not I will & wid
M
"repugnant to the law of England"
mercede to price that tonich Spiraline,
may by mactment admit the
Evidence of "such persons"
on
"any
conditions Thanly imposed :" Evidently
theresne without rath, iz
desired.
But his ) B's achinance
>
500 for hyond this, enabling the
Courts to about the Evidence
generally, withet oath.
354
1
"Heathers"
It seems to me plain that
Kel of Parl! will all warrant
this. It can only be good on
么
supferition that the "doubts" recited
wunded: and Hat
in the Art are
much a law is within the scope of the Jeneral powns of a Colonial Lépilature.
If is lean the matten alore,
snad again
fie) B. will probably at this provision, since the Law Adrien an
Lehen 20
Ajerlin to it.
Hall
47
Gave it alone?
take a farther opinion?
Or snight it not be desirable
to amend the Art of
Parl by
உ
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.